Did MLB’s MASN arbitration panel really rule “in favor” of the Nationals?

The Orioles and Nationals have been disputing the “market value” MASN is required to pay the Nationals annually to televise their games in the DC market. In 2011, when the original MASN contract called for a “reset” of the Nationals’ compensation from MASN, the Orioles and  Nationals were so far apart on the definition of “market value” the matter was referred to an arbitration panel to settle the conflict. The Orioles, it was reported, believed the “market value” for the Nationals TV rights to be around $35 million annually. The Nationals, it was also reported, believed the number to be somewhere in between $100 million and $120 million. You can see why the Orioles and the Nationals couldn’t reach a compromise.

The baseball world waited…and waited…and waited for a decision from the arbitration panel for over two years. On July 29, the Hollywood Reporter reported that the arbitration panel finally made a decision–in favor of the Nationals. The Orioles are now challenging that panel decision in court.

The Hollywood Reporter wrote:

Per the terms of the settlement, beginning in 2012 MASN had to pay the Nationals “fair market value.” The TV station balked, and so an arbitration hearing commenced in April before a panel comprising the chief operating officer of the New York Mets, the president of the Pittsburgh Pirates and the owner of the Tampa Bay Rays. Some of this has been previously reported. The Nationals reportedly got $29 million per year under the old TV contract and wanted it bumped up to somewhere between $100 million and $120 million per year.

What’s been kept under wraps until now is that on June 30, the MLB committee adjudicating the dispute issued its decision, which favored the Nationals. That prompted attorneys to swing into high gear and Commissioner Selig to attempt to get out in front of the situation.

The Washington Post–who were completely scooped in this matter by a non-competitor 3,000 miles away that doesn’t even cover sports–scrambled to catch up. They too, reported that MLB’s arbitration panel ruled in favor of the Nationals. 

The Post’s Adam Kilgore wrote, soon after the Hollywood Reporter story:

Major League Baseball’s arbitration panel ruled in favor of the Washington Nationals in their longstanding, contentious dispute with the Baltimore Orioles over television rights fees from the Mid-Atlantic Sports Network, a person familiar with the situation confirmed Tuesday afternoon.

The person would not reveal the terms of the June 30 ruling that might only begin a new, litigious chapter in the acrimonious, years-long squabble over profits from MASN. Last week in New York’s Supreme Court, the Nationals filed a motion against MASN, which is majority-owned by the Orioles; that case has been sealed. MLB, the Orioles and MASN acknowledged the dispute remains unsettled in official statements issued Tuesday.

But did the panel really rule “in favor” of the Nationals? It is true that the arbitration panel’s decision is under seal by the court, but the rest of the court documents are on the Supreme Court of New York’s website for anyone to read, and they contain enough clues to figure out exactly how the arbitration panel ruled.

In a letter dated July 3, 2014 on the Court’s website, an attorney for the Nationals wrote MASN asking for “an additional $10,037,204.50 in telecast rights fee payments” because a prior “payment of $9,818,358.50 failed to reflect the fair market value of the telecast rights licensed by the Nationals.” The letter made it clear this money demand was being made pursuant to the arbitration panel’s June 30 ruling.

Furthermore, elsewhere in the legal pleadings, it is stated “the Nationals receive quarterly payments of telecast rights fees”–that is, 4 times a year. If MASN paid the Nationals $9,818,358.50 and the Nationals are owed an additional $10,037,204.50 pursuant to the arbitration panel, that means the arbitration panel’s June 30 decision requires MASN to pay the Nats $19,855,563 every quarter. Over a calendar year, this means arbitration panel ruled the “fair market value” of the Nationals TV rights to be $79,422,252.

Legal pleadings filed August 13 by the Nationals attorneys argue “for just 2014, MASN to date has deprived the Nationals of $15,055,806.75 (not including interest). If MASN also fails, for the next (and final 2014) payment due on September 1, to pay the amounts required by the RSDC decision, MASN will have deprived the Nationals of $20,074,409.00 just for 2014.”

$20,074,409 divided by two equals exactly $10,037,204.50, the amount demanded by the Nationals in their July 3 letter. That $10,037,204.50 amount was likely payment for two quarters worth of extra rights fee payments. Using the new numbers, $9,818,358.50, the quarterly amount previously being paid by MASN to the Orioles plus the additional $20,074,409 ordered by the arbitration panel means the Nationals “fair market value” TV rights are valued at $59,347,843 annually by the arbitration panel.

Remember, the Nationals asked for over $100 million annually. Since the arbitration panel valued the Nats’ TV rights to be worth $79 $59 million, I’ll leave it to you to decide whether they really ruled “in favor” of the Nationals. To me, it sounds like a compromise between the Nationals and Orioles two demands.

Kilgore didn’t reveal his “person familiar with the situation” but perhaps it’s telling this person didn’t actually reveal the numbers in the arbitration panel’s decision, only the conclusion that it was “in favor” of the Nationals. If this “person familiar with the situation” worked for MASN or the Orioles, you can see why they’d want to keep Kilgore in the dark and let him print their conclusions as fact.

UPDATE: Legal pleadings filed late on August 13 suggest the number could be even less than the $79 million estimated above. Attorneys for the Nationals wrote “the fair market value of the Nationals’ telecast rights as awarded by the RSDC is on average $58.4 million less per year than the amount requested by the Nationals during the RSDC proceeding – while, at the same time, only $20.1 million more per year on average than the amount MASN advocated.” Without knowing the amount asked for before the arbitration panel, it’s impossible to know exactly how much they valued the “market value” of the Nats TV right. But it’s clear the amount is far below the $100+ the Nationals demanded.

 

Baseball is dying…enjoy it while it lasts

It’s hard to go a full day nowadays without hearing or reading some version of the tired “baseball is dying” narrative. During football season, baseball is dying because football is more popular. During basketball season, baseball is dying because there’s no LeBron James in baseball. This summer during the World Cup, baseball was dying because baseball is long and boring, and kids don’t have the patience to watch it.

At the center of this narrative is always the idea that one sport’s success must come at another sports expense. In the “baseball is dying” narrative, that other sport is always baseball. Well, I reject that zero-sum theory of sports popularity. I watched the World Cup this summer, and it won’t make me any less likely to watch the World Series this fall. I have two fantasy football teams and I watch the Redskins every Sunday. Neither of those facts make me less likely to attend Nationals games in the summer (and Monday-Saturday in the fall). People have time for more than one sport in their lives. If anything, the success of football, basketball, and soccer creates more sports fans, and more sports fans creates a larger market, of which baseball can eventually take advantage.

The leads to Keith Olbermann, who addressed the topic of baseball’s “declining popularity” last night (the video and commentary can be found here on Hardball Talk). The video clip is worth watching, but in case you cannot stand the sound of Olbermann’s voice, allow me to summarize his main points. Olbermann argues National TV ratings are down (this is true), the number of kids citing baseball as their favorite sport is down (also true), and the median age of baseball fans is rising (true). Olbermann discounts nearly every other metric (attendance, accessibility, quality) that suggests baseball is in the best shape it’s ever been. One favorable metric cited by Olbermann, local TV ratings, is immediately discarded by him as irrelevant, with no explanation why (presumably, because it didn’t fit his narrative). Simple logic might dictate that high local TV ratings are precisely why National TV ratings are so low. Furthermore, ten years ago, I couldn’t pull out an iPad and watch literally every MLB game played that day. I didn’t have the MLB Network and the MLB iPhone app to ensure I didn’t miss a single relevant highlight from the previous night. In 2014, the “National Game of the Week” couldn’t be more redundant. It’s just another game.

Also discarded by Olbermann is the fact that baseball is healthy on a local level for almost every Major League club. Outside a few miserable markets (Tampa for instance), attendance is strong and competitiveness and parity are at an all time high. Fifteen of the 30 MLB teams are averaging over 30 thousand fans a night and all but two are averaging over 20 thousand. More importantly, in mid-August, 22 of the 30 MLB teams still have a realistic shot at the playoffs. Maybe these numbers suggest baseball fans’ attention is directed where it should be: inwards toward their hometown team. Whereas the sports world gawks at the LeBron spectacle from afar, those same sports fans are enjoying baseball by buying tickets to watch a pennant race involving their own teams.

There’s never been a better time to enjoy baseball. I couldn’t be a bigger fan…yet right now I don’t even know when/where to find the National TV “Game of the Week.”

I suppose that means I’m part of the problem. So I guess baseball is dying, and I’m proof why.

Nationals v. Braves Sunday Night Baseball Drinking Game

beer-comparison-nationals_606

The Nationals don’t make it onto the national stage very often, and when they do, it’s usually for the wrong reasons: the latest Bryce Harper fauxtraversy, lingering obsession with the Strasburg Shutdown, and–in some unenlightened circles–misconceptions about the Jayson Werth contract.

The Nationals play the Braves tonight on Sunday Night Baseball, which promises to be a rare appearance on baseball’s premier showcase. Since it’s ESPN, and John Kruk will be doing a lot of talking, expect a steady parade of the tired and insignificant topics the Nationals are too often associated with in this type of platform. And if you’re so inclined, and don’t have to work on Monday, participate in the drinking game below. Warning: it may be hazardous to your health. And only participate if you’re over 21 years of age, or 19 and watching from Canada.

Category I — Take a BIG sip of your beverage of choice if any of the below topics are mentioned on the broadcast

- The Strasburg Shutdown of 2012

- Game 5

- Jayson Werth’s salary and/or contract

Category II — Only take a small sip of your beverage of choice if any of the below topics are mentioned on the broadcast–and ONLY take a small sip because all of these topics involve Bryce Harper and we want you to live through the night

- Bryce Haper dragging his foot across the Braves logo

- Bryce Harper maybe being sent to the minors

- Bryce Harper hitting a walk-off home run on Thursday

- Any “conflict” between Bryce Harper and Denard Span

- Any comparison between Bryce Harper and Mike Trout

- Bryce Harper being benched in April

- Bryce Harper hurting his thumb in April (take a double drink if they show a replay of Harper injuring his thumb last night)

- Any mention of the word “Hustle” when talking about Bryce Harper

Category III – Bryce Harper getting booed

- In the event ESPN turns up the volume of the crowd when Harper walks to the plate, and the ESPN announcers stop talking so the at-home TV audience can hear the boos, start drinking and do not stop until one of the TV announcers begins talking again. This will probably happen, so have your beverage handy when Harper walks to the plate.

Category IV – Don’t be a Clown

- In the event any ESPN personality makes a joke about “clown questions””clown moves” or any other statement involving the word “clown” finish your drink and get a new one. You’ll need it.

Insta-reaction: Nationals trade Zach Walters for infielder Asdrubal Cabrera

Mike Rizzo is smart enough to know holes in the roster are the most dangerous things for a pennant contender to have. Throughout most the 2013 season, the Nationals had holes at second base (with Danny Espinosa’s poor season), catcher (with Kurt Suzuki’s poor season) and outfield (with the inability to find a replacement for Jayson Werth and Bryce Harper, who both spent time on the disabled list).

Now that the Nationals are entering the home stretch of the 2014 season with the narrowest of division leads, they cannot go into it with a hole in their roster.

So the Nationals traded 24 year-old infielder Zach Walters to the Indians for 28 year-old former All-Star Asdrubal Cabrera.

Cabrera is just a rental, since he will be eligible for free agency after the season. But it was a rental the Nationals needed to make. Ryan Zimmerman is likely out for the regular season, which means Anthony Rendon will play at third base full time. This leaves second base open with few options on the Nationals roster to fill it.

Last season’s opening day starter Danny Espinosa cannot be counted on to provide the offense necessary for the Nationals to score enough runs to win the division. Despite being a switch hitter, Espinosa is batting .186 with a .245 OBP and .296 SLG in 216 plate appearances against right-handed pitching. Espinosa is batting much better against left-handed pitchers (.295/.375/.474), but since two thirds of his at bats promise to come from the left-side, he cannot be dependable as a full-time player.

Mike Rizzo obviously felt there were no other options on the roster to play 2B. Kevin Frandsen is close to worthless. Zach Walters was the only other option to play second base, but Rizzo probably had doubts about his ability to make consistent contact. Walter had 16 strikeouts in 43 plate appearances in limited action this season. His strikeout rates in the minors were equally high. Rizzo also places a premium on defense. He likely didn’t feel Walters had enough experience or skill to man second base the majority of the Nats’ remaining 2014 innings.

Personally, I was hoping for Matt Williams to platoon Espinosa and Walters, with them alternating against lefties and righties, respectively. Espinosa provides great value from the right side and Walters deserved a chance to prove himself based on his unbelievable numbers in AAA this season (.300/.358/.608). This past week would have been an ideal time to give Walters a tryout instead of wasting at bats on Frandsen and Espinosa from the left side.

But Rizzo probably felt he didn’t have time to waste on a Walters experiment. Players traded after today must go through waivers, so this might be the last chance to upgrade the roster. In Cabrera, Rizzo is getting a proven commodity. Cabrera’s best seasons were 2011 and ’12 when he got on base at a .332 and .338 clip, with the ability to hit for extra bases. In 2011, he had 60 extra base hits.

In Walters, Rizzo is not giving up a cornerstone of the future. In my Red Porch Report Trade Rankings, I ranked Walters as the 32nd most valuable player in the Nationals system. Despite his good AAA numbers, his high strikeout rates indicated that his upside was limited as a major league player.

Rizzo probably felt a combo of Espinosa/Walters was too risky. The Nationals are not a lineup constructed to allow holes in the lineup. There is no Miguel Cabrera or Nelson Cruz on this team. The Nationals are constructed with a high number of above average hitters with no superstars. They score runs by keeping the train moving. With a hole in the lineup, that train gets derailed. Too many automatic outs in 2013 killed the Nats playoff hopes. Rizzo wasn’t going to let that happen again.

Please Stop The Phrase “Battle of the Beltways”

Now that the Nationals / O’s series in over (I know there is still a game on the 4th,), there is one thing that really bothers me about the coverage.  The marketing phrase “The Battle of the Beltways” is stupid for quite a few reasons.

You may think this is an overreaction, but a Google search turns up 29,100 results for “battle of the beltways.”  The phase was spouted by MASN over the last few days like they got a nickel every time it was used or it was part of a subversive drinking game to ensure regional inebriation.   Please make it stop.

It is the bastardization of the original marketing line “Beltway Series.” The only problem, Baltimore is not on the Capital Beltway.  So,  someone realized that Baltimore has a road they call the beltway so they just added a “s” and kept the phase.  The new phrase doesn’t even make sense.  How do two roads battle?

“The Beltway” is a phrase used to describe the road that goes around DC.  It is a pop culture idiom to describe things that happen in the Federal Government.  It’s a phrase used  on the nightly news and nickname used by political insiders. It is a world-wide phrase associated with the Nations Capital.  Nobody outside of Dundalk knows there is a road that goes around Baltimore or much cares.  “Battle of the Beltways gives way to much credit to a city whose claim to fame is being the subject of a very good HBO show about their corruption and a cheaper place to film movies and TV shows about Washington, DC.  I am sure they use the phrase Beltway like a little brother says “me too.”

I wouldn’t really care, but It looks like the name is becoming permanent and there needs to stop. Ironically the phrase “Battle for the Beltway” would be more appropriate considering how much the O’s covet the Washington DC area as a fan base.  Than again the Nats only exist due to the kindness of Angelos, right, Buck “get in the bleeping box” Showalter?

Nats Contract Recoup Tracker: Believe it or not Werth is on track to earn his contract this year

A little over half way through the season every Nats starter but Zimmerman has already or is on track to recoup their contract.  As far a Harper goes, he is not even close to playing at replacement level yet.

Player Salary WAR Value % Recoup Game
Rendon $2,700,000 3.1 $18,600,000 689% -
Werth $20,571,429 1.9 $11,400,000 55% 157
Desmond $6,500,000 1.6 $9,600,000 148% 59
Span $6,500,000 1.4 $8,400,000 129% -
LaRoche $12,000,000 1.3 $7,800,000 65% 134
Ramos $2,095,000 1.2 $7,200,000 344% -
Zimmerman $14,000,000 0.7 $4,200,000 30% 290
Espinosa $540,850 0.3 $1,800,000 333% -
Hairston $2,500,000 -0.1 -$600,000 -24% -
McLouth $5,000,000 -0.1 -$600,000 -12% -
Lobaton $950,000 -0.1 -$600,000 -63% -
Frandsen $900,000 -0.1 -$600,000 -67% -
Harper $2,150,000 -0.4 -$2,400,000 -112% -